House · Roll call 54 · Feb. 4, 2026

A vote to send H.R. 4090, the Critical Mineral Dominance Act, back to committee instead of moving to a final vote on passage.

Failed209–212 Procedural Party-line vote
Download image (PNG)
Question
On Motion to Recommit
Bill
H.R. 4090, Critical Mineral Dominance Act
← Most liberalThe aisleMost conservative →
YesNoPresentDid not vote
Each dot is one current member, in the same seat as on their member page, from most liberal (left) to most conservative (right). Color shows how they voted. Seats show current members. Members who have since left Congress appear in the list below.

How each party voted

Democrats
Yes 209 · No 0 · Did not vote 5
Republicans
Yes 0 · No 212 · Did not vote 6

Most Democrats voted Yes (209 of 214).

Most Republicans voted No (212 of 218).

Party-line vote: most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides.

About this vote

A motion to recommit sends a bill back to committee and is usually the minority's last chance to change it before the final vote. H.R. 4090 directs the Department of the Interior to address weaknesses in mineral supply chains, including by speeding up and expanding mineral production on federal land. The motion failed, so the bill was not sent back to committee.

This summary was drafted and checked with AI (Claude) using only the official record of the vote. Report an error

Summary by the Congressional Research Service

Critical Mineral Dominance Act This bill directs the Department of the Interior to address mineral supply chain vulnerabilities, including by accelerating and expanding mineral production on federal land (i.e., National Forest System land, public lands, and any land that may be leased for the exploration, development, or production of hardrock minerals).

How each member voted

MemberSeatTheir vote
Loading…

Embed this on your site

Copy this code into your page. It shows a box with the latest numbers from Capitol Lens, with a credit line underneath. Free to use with the credit line.

Preview