House · Roll call 87 · April 1, 2025
A vote to adopt H.Res. 282, the rule setting the terms for debating S.J.Res. 18, S.J.Res. 28, H.R. 1526, and H.R. 22.
Failed206–222
Resolution
Party-line vote
How did your own members vote? Find them by address or ZIP code
- Question
- On Agreeing to the Resolution
- Bill
- H.Res. 282, Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
← Most liberalThe aisleMost conservative →
YesNoPresentDid not voteYour members
How each party voted
Most Democrats voted No (213 of 213).
Most Republicans voted Yes (206 of 218).
Party-line vote: most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides.
About this vote
H.Res. 282 sets the terms for debating two resolutions to overturn Consumer Financial Protection Bureau rules, a bill limiting the power of federal district courts to issue injunctions, and a bill requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections. The rule failed, so it was not adopted.
This summary was drafted and checked with AI (Claude) using only the official record of the vote. Report an error
How each member voted
| Member | Seat | Their vote |
|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||