Senate · Roll call 309 · June 12, 2025

A vote to table, or set aside, a proposal to S. 1582, the GENIUS Act, whose official description says only that it would improve the bill.

Motion to Table Failed45–52 Procedural Party-line vote
Question
On the Motion to Table
Bill
S. 1582, GENIUS Act
← Most liberalThe aisleMost conservative →
YesNoPresentDid not vote
Each dot is one current member, in the same seat as on their member page, from most liberal (left) to most conservative (right). Color shows how they voted. Seats show current members. Members who have since left Congress appear in the list below.

How each party voted

Democrats
Yes 42 · No 0 · Did not vote 3
Republicans
Yes 1 · No 52
Independent
Yes 2 · No 0

Most Democrats voted Yes (42 of 45).

Most Republicans voted No (52 of 53).

Party-line vote: most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides.

About this vote

The GENIUS Act would set up a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, which are digital assets that the issuer must redeem for a fixed value, and would allow only permitted issuers to issue them. A motion to table sets a pending proposal aside, which kills it. The motion to table failed, so the proposal remained pending.

This summary was drafted and checked with AI (Claude) using only the official record of the vote. Report an error

Summary by the Congressional Research Service

Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act or the GENIUS Act This act establishes a regulatory framework for payment stablecoins (digital assets which an issuer must redeem for a fixed value). Under the act, only permitted issuers may issue a payment stablecoin for use by U.S.

How each member voted

MemberSeatTheir vote
Loading…

Embed this on your site

Copy this code into your page. It shows a box with the latest numbers from Capitol Lens, with a credit line underneath. Free to use with the credit line.

Preview