Senate · Roll call 82 · April 15, 2026
A vote to table, and thereby kill, a pending proposal during Senate action on H.J.Res. 140; the record does not identify the proposal.
How did your own members vote? Find them by address or ZIP code
- Question
- On the Motion to Table
- Bill
- H.J.Res. 140, Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.
How each party voted
Most Democrats voted No (45 of 45).
Most Republicans voted Yes (51 of 53).
Party-line vote: most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides.
About this vote
A motion to table sets a proposal aside, which kills it. The record does not say which proposal was tabled. H.J.Res. 140 overturns a Bureau of Land Management rule, Public Land Order No. 7917, on the withdrawal of federal lands in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, Minnesota; according to the Congressional Research Service summary, this opens about 225,504 acres of National Forest System lands there to mineral and geothermal leasing. The motion to table passed, so the proposal was set aside.
This summary was drafted and checked with AI (Claude) using only the official record of the vote. Report an error
Summary by the Congressional Research Service
This joint resolution opens approximately 225,504 acres of National Forest System lands in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties in Minnesota to mineral and geothermal leasing.
How each member voted
| Member | Seat | Their vote |
|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||