Senate · Roll call 84 · April 16, 2026
A vote to pass H.J.Res. 140, which overturns a Bureau of Land Management land withdrawal order in three Minnesota counties, opening those lands to mineral and geothermal leasing.
How did your own members vote? Find them by address or ZIP code
- Question
- On the Joint Resolution
- Bill
- H.J.Res. 140, Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to Public Land Order No. 7917 for Withdrawal of Federal Lands; Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, MN.
How each party voted
Most Democrats voted No (45 of 45).
Most Republicans voted Yes (50 of 53).
Party-line vote: most Democrats and most Republicans voted on opposite sides.
President's positions
The President's position: wanted a Yes vote
“The Administration strongly supports passage of H.J. Res. 140”
Source: White House statement on the bill · Checked against the statement (AI-assisted)
About this vote
Under the Congressional Review Act, Congress can overturn a federal agency rule by passing a joint resolution of disapproval, which also needs the President's signature. H.J.Res. 140 overturns a Bureau of Land Management rule, Public Land Order No. 7917, on the withdrawal of federal lands in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties, Minnesota; according to the Congressional Research Service summary, this opens about 225,504 acres of National Forest System lands there to mineral and geothermal leasing. The joint resolution passed the Senate.
This summary was drafted and checked with AI (Claude) using only the official record of the vote. Report an error
Summary by the Congressional Research Service
This joint resolution opens approximately 225,504 acres of National Forest System lands in Cook, Lake, and Saint Louis Counties in Minnesota to mineral and geothermal leasing.
How each member voted
| Member | Seat | Their vote |
|---|---|---|
| Loading… | ||